In distance education, designing
instruction that incorporates a collaborative learning community can be a
difficult task. However, assessing
individual student contribution on the given task can be a greater challenge. While it is acceptable to alter instructional
methods to meet the demands of our ever changing society, we hold tight to the
traditional methods of assessment.
However, as we’ve grown to learn that traditional lecture-based
instruction is not always (or mostly) the best method to maximize student
achievement and performance, educators have vastly remained stagnant in
assessing. This unbalance may be why
assessing collaboration or “group work” so difficult for educators in kindergarten
through grad school.
In order to prepare our students
to meet the demands of our ever-changing society, our philosophical shifts must
occur within instruction AND assessment.
Building learning communities that foster collaboration requires student
participation (Palloff & Pratt, 2007).
The amount of information recall as student obtains is no longer our
main concern. However, the ways in which
students use their knowledge to improve the overall success of the group is
key. Collaboration is often product
focused, but assessing the final product does not give a fair or clear picture
of individual student performance.
George Siemens offers multiple suggestions on how to change our
assessment models to match our instructional goals (Laureate Education Inc.,
2008). Peer and self-assessment provide
instructors with insight on how individual contributions lead to final
product. Educators need to assess
collaboration work based on the contributions made by individual students and
how those students fostered interaction throughout the group (Laureate
Education Inc., 2008). Wikis and
learning management systems can track individual contributions throughout the
entirety of a project and assist in accurately assessing participation in
collaboration efforts. This can help
ensure that the product was completed collaboratively by all members of the
learning community.
Not everyone openly embraces
collaboration in a learning community.
Often, individual accomplishments were acclaimed in the past and due to
the definition of collaboration, some can have a “loss of self” mentality
(Laureate Education Inc., 2008). This
can lead to failure for not only the individual but the group. Jeffery Hammond reminds us in his blog of the
significance of communicating the individual importance of each group
member. Without individual
participation, the group will be unsuccessful.
Instructors and learning communities can take measures to prevent this
from occurring. In the very beginning,
instructors need to ensure that every student feels welcomed and clear and direct
expectations are provided, and learning communities should create a team
charter that explicitly defines individual roles and expectations from within
the group (Palloff & Pratt, 2007). If
this fails, the instructor should step in to mediate without dominating the
group or relinquishing control from the active members (Palloff & Pratt,
2007). Regardless of preventative
measures, there will be times when a student refuses to participate or
participates in a negative manner. This
is why clear and concise expectations given at the start is so important. The groundwork is laid and assessments should
be given based on the initial expectations and charter. Active participants should not be negatively
assessed based on these behaviors. The
instructor may need to reconstruct groups in order for the active participants
to be successful.
Collaboration is an effective and
meaningful instructional strategy that will provide students with the skills
needed to collaborate in the corporate world.
Designing appropriate assessments for collaboration is essential for
successful and productive collaboration learning communities.
References
Laureate Education, Inc.
(2008). Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore, MD: Author.Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Blog replies to:
LeAnn Morris
http://leannmorris.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358101719892#c5821701707820266493
Karen Wagoner
http://wagzz1.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358102334829#c4082333498262476745
LeAnn Morris
http://leannmorris.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358101719892#c5821701707820266493
Karen Wagoner
http://wagzz1.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358102334829#c4082333498262476745




