Video Presentation Responses


On Saturday, February 16, 2013, LeAnn Morris, Sharmaine Sharusan, and I met synchronously on Skype as a learning community to discuss our video presentations.  Our meeting lasted roughly 55 minutes.  

Responses to my learning community:

LeAnn:

Shar:

Additonal responses were made to the following:

Marha:


Lori: 

Allison: 

Credibility of Online Learning Video Presentation




Annotated References
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC.
            Presents the research findings on the state of online learning in the United States.  This was the tenth year this research has been conducted.  Surveyed items include the growth in online education, perceptions and acceptance of online learning by faculty, as well as the effectiveness of online education in comparison to traditional educational settings.  Statistical graphs portray the changes occurred during the varying time frames.

Raj, S., & Al-Alawheh, M. (2010). A Perspective on Online Degrees Vs. Face-to-Face in the Academic Field Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of Learning International Networks Consortium. Cambridge, MA; LINC.
            Described the perspectives of employers in regards to the acceptability of online distant education programs of online doctoral degrees.  Delivers insight into the minds of hiring officials from multiple fields depicting the uncertainties surrounding online graduate degree programs.  Suggests new approaches to instructional design for online courses could improve these perceptions.

Richardson, J. (2010). Online Credentials: A State of Wariness. School Administrator, 67(8), 18-22.
            Discusses the skepticisms found in personnel directors towards individuals with a graduate degree that was primarily obtained online.  School districts are noted as being reluctant to hire administrators without a traditional education.  Research suggests that individuals with a degree obtained online are viewed as under qualified to potential employers.

Shelton, K. (2011). A Review of Paradigms for Evaluating the Quality of Online Education Programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume IV, Spring 2011(Number I).

Sinow, R. &.-B. (2012). The Value and Acceptability of an Online Degree in Hiring Gatekeepers’ choice for Employment in the Multimedia Production Industry. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1918-1927). Chesapeake: AACE.
            Describes the acceptability of online degrees in the multimedia production industry.  Studies show that individuals with experience in online learning are more likely to accept online degrees.  Hiring personnel from technology-based fields find online degrees more credible than that of management fields.  Limitations to peer interaction is viewed as a weakness of online education.  General acceptance of online degree programs rises.

Udegbe, I. (2012, March). Attitudes of Prospective Human Resource Personnel towards Distance Learning Degrees. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XV(1).
            Discusses the attitudes of human resource personnel towards obtaining online degrees.  The majority of those surveyed believed traditional campus-based universities provided a more rigorous experience.  Nearly 43% of respondents stated that they would not hire someone with an online degree.  Overall, only a third of employers surveys had favorable attitudes towards online learning.

Vukelic, B. &. (2011). Employers' evaluation of online education. Annals Of DAAAM & Proceedings, 1471-1472.
            Research studies conducted in Austria discovered employers held negative opinion towards applicants with online degrees.  90% stated that online degrees did not provide adequate skills and/or knowledge for successful potential employees.  It was noted that often it is difficult to differentiate between degrees obtained online and degrees earned from a traditional academic setting.

Zain-Ul-Abdin, K. &. (2010). The acceptability of online degrees in teacher training and hiring. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 995-1000). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
            Provides research findings on high school principals’ acceptance of potential teachers with licensure degrees obtained online.  Findings showed that 95% of those surveyed would not hire a teacher with an online degree.  Meanwhile, 99% stated they would choose an applicant with a traditional education over one with an online degree.  The participants’ reasoning was that online programs could not provide adequate socialization required of effective teachers.

Additional Resources
Todd Oppenheimer clips retrieved from YouTube: 
Images retrieved from:

Static versus Dynamic Technologies


I believe I fall somewhere between static and dynamic on this continuum.  According to Moller (2008), "The middle-of-the-road approaches allow learners to interact with the content." However, in thinking of distance education, I believe that higher levels of learning occur when using more dynamic tools.  In order for me to move towards dynamic technologies, I must first gain a deep understanding of how to use the technologies.  While I have experience in Google Apps, wikis, and Dropbox, I don't feel like my level of knowledge is enough to be able to successfully integrate them into a distance education setting.  Research shows that a teacher's experience with the technologies is more important than teaching experience (Fahy, 2008).  Therefore, as I increase my abilities with the different dynamic tools, I will become more effective as a distance education educator.

Fahy, P. (2008). Characteristics of Interactive Online Learning Media. The Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 305-340). Edmonton: AU Press

Moller, L. (2008). Static and dynamic technological tools. [Unpublished Paper].

Reply to LeAnn
http://leannmorris.blogspot.com/2013/02/module-5-moving-toward-dynamic_3.html?showComment=1360441368126#c6055820194136637570

Reply to Shar
http://docshar.blogspot.com/2013/02/module-5-static-versus-dynamic.html?showComment=1360441780522#c256110228732031420