Assessing Collaboration

Module 3

In distance education, designing instruction that incorporates a collaborative learning community can be a difficult task.  However, assessing individual student contribution on the given task can be a greater challenge.  While it is acceptable to alter instructional methods to meet the demands of our ever changing society, we hold tight to the traditional methods of assessment.  However, as we’ve grown to learn that traditional lecture-based instruction is not always (or mostly) the best method to maximize student achievement and performance, educators have vastly remained stagnant in assessing.  This unbalance may be why assessing collaboration or “group work” so difficult for educators in kindergarten through grad school.

In order to prepare our students to meet the demands of our ever-changing society, our philosophical shifts must occur within instruction AND assessment.  Building learning communities that foster collaboration requires student participation (Palloff & Pratt, 2007).  The amount of information recall as student obtains is no longer our main concern.  However, the ways in which students use their knowledge to improve the overall success of the group is key.  Collaboration is often product focused, but assessing the final product does not give a fair or clear picture of individual student performance.  George Siemens offers multiple suggestions on how to change our assessment models to match our instructional goals (Laureate Education Inc., 2008).  Peer and self-assessment provide instructors with insight on how individual contributions lead to final product.  Educators need to assess collaboration work based on the contributions made by individual students and how those students fostered interaction throughout the group (Laureate Education Inc., 2008).  Wikis and learning management systems can track individual contributions throughout the entirety of a project and assist in accurately assessing participation in collaboration efforts.  This can help ensure that the product was completed collaboratively by all members of the learning community.

Not everyone openly embraces collaboration in a learning community.  Often, individual accomplishments were acclaimed in the past and due to the definition of collaboration, some can have a “loss of self” mentality (Laureate Education Inc., 2008).  This can lead to failure for not only the individual but the group.  Jeffery Hammond reminds us in his blog of the significance of communicating the individual importance of each group member.  Without individual participation, the group will be unsuccessful.  Instructors and learning communities can take measures to prevent this from occurring.  In the very beginning, instructors need to ensure that every student feels welcomed and clear and direct expectations are provided, and learning communities should create a team charter that explicitly defines individual roles and expectations from within the group (Palloff & Pratt, 2007).  If this fails, the instructor should step in to mediate without dominating the group or relinquishing control from the active members (Palloff & Pratt, 2007).  Regardless of preventative measures, there will be times when a student refuses to participate or participates in a negative manner.  This is why clear and concise expectations given at the start is so important.  The groundwork is laid and assessments should be given based on the initial expectations and charter.  Active participants should not be negatively assessed based on these behaviors.  The instructor may need to reconstruct groups in order for the active participants to be successful. 

Collaboration is an effective and meaningful instructional strategy that will provide students with the skills needed to collaborate in the corporate world.  Designing appropriate assessments for collaboration is essential for successful and productive collaboration learning communities.

References

Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Blog replies to:

LeAnn Morris
http://leannmorris.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358101719892#c5821701707820266493

Karen Wagoner
http://wagzz1.blogspot.com/2013/01/assessing-collaborative-efforts.html?showComment=1358102334829#c4082333498262476745